Writings from ancient Egypt (Middle Kingdom, 2000-1800 BCE) said there were three genders of humans: male ( tie), sekhet (s ht), and female ( hemet), in that order.The word "sekhet" in ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs. These included eunuchs, women who couldn't or weren't allowed to have children, men who live as women, intersex people, gay people, and others. Sumerian and Akkadian tablets from the 2nd millennium BCE and 1700 BCE describe how the gods created these people, their roles in society, and words for different kinds of them. In Mesopotamian mythology, among the earliest written records of humanity, there are references to types of people who are neither male nor female.Changes in the use of gendered versus gender-neutral language.Events that show that transgender and especially nonbinary gender identities existed long before the twentieth century.Skim nonbinary blogs looking for past and current historical events.Events concerning nonbinary celebrities, and historical persons who clearly stated they were neither female nor male, or both, or androgynes, etc.Events in the movement for keeping the genders of babies undisclosed.
Please help fill out this time-line if you can add information of these kinds: This should be mentioned in the more respectful form of, for example, "assigned male at birth ( AMAB), lived as a woman," rather than "really a man, passed as a woman." For another example, writing "a military doctor discovered Smith was AFAB" is more respectful than saying "a military doctor discovered Smith was really a woman." For people who lived before the word "transgender" was created, it may be more suitable to call them "gender variant" rather than "transgender." On the other hand, if we have enough information about such a person, we may do best by such people by describing them with the terminology that they most likely would have used for their gender identity if they lived in the present day, with our language. For example, it's not known whether certain historical people who were assigned female at birth ( AFAB) lived as men because they identified as men (were transgender men), or because it was the only way to have a career in that time and place (and were gender non-conforming cisgender women). In the case of some historical people, history has recorded how they lived, and what gender they were assigned at birth, but not how they preferred to label their gender identity. It is disrespectful to label a person's gender otherwise than they ask for, but it's not always possible to do so. Words for a person's gender, assigned and otherwise.Some historical persons whose preferred pronouns aren't known should be called here by no pronouns. It is disrespectful to call a person by pronouns other than those that they ask for. This should be written in the form of "Chosen Name (née Birth Name)." If history isn't sure which name that person earnestly preferred, write it in the form of "Name, or Other Name." In this history, some deceased historical transgender persons may have their birth names shown in addition to their chosen names, in cases where it is not known which name they preferred, or where it is otherwise impossible to find information about that person, if one wants to research their history. For living transgender people in particular, this history should show only their chosen names, not their dead names. Some consider their dead name a secret that shouldn't be put in public at all. It is disrespectful to call a transgender person by their former name ("dead name") rather than the name that they chose for themself. Here are some tips for writing respectfully about historical gender variant people whose actual preferred names, pronouns, and gender identities might not be known.
0 kommentar(er)
